NY Exploring Taxing Internet Sales

Governor Eliot L. Spitzer of New York is considering requiring companies that have $10,000 or more in New York sales to collect Internet taxes. Apparently, New Yorkers are not filing and paying their required state retail taxes on the Internet purchases. Governor Spitzer wants to shift that paperwork burden to businesses.

http://www.buffalonews.com/149/story/279666.html

Most States Still Not Compliant

Practical Ecommerce has very good article summarizing the current state of compliance with the Streamlined Sales Tax act. Most states are still not compliant.

Read the entire article.

Wisconsin State Revenue Secretary Pushing For Streamlined Sales Tax

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel is reporting that state Revenue Secretary Roger Ervin is pushing Wisconsin legislators to pass the Streamlined Sales Tax.

"But Ervin said the Streamlined Sales Tax would "reduce the cost of compliance for businesses and level the playing field for in-state businesses that are required to collect sales taxes."


Many small businesses would be curious as to how Mr Ervin deduces that the Streamlined Sales tax would reduce the cost of compliance for businesses. That seems not to have occured in any state which has adopted the Streamlined Sales Tax initiative. Most business find that rather than collecting state, county and city sales taxes that they are now responsible for collecting and reporting taxes for hundreds of taxing authorities. Modifications to software alone can easily cost businesses thousands of dollars.

Read the entire article.

Indiana Senate Bill 0233 Introduced - Streamlined Sales Tax Conformity

IndyStar.com reports that:

"Senate Bill 233, sponsored by Sen. Luke Kenley, passed the Senate this week and is headed to the House."


While focused mostly on adding digital products to taxable sales, many e-tailers are concerned that the new taxes will increase prices enough to trigger increased pirating and lose of sales.

Read the entire article.

Indiana Senate Bill 233

Vermont Town Loses $800,000 Due to Simplified Sales Tax

An article in the Times Argus Online announces how the state of Vermont gained $750,000 in new state sales tax, but the local town of Manchester lost $800,000. One could argue there's a $50,000 loss between monies gained and monies lost.

"Although the state has seen an increase in revenue from being part of the agreement, it has taken its toll on at least one municipality. The town of Manchester, which collects a 1 percent local option tax on retail sales, is expected to close out its current fiscal year with a reduction of about $800,000 from last year's local option tax revenue"


One of the drawbacks of joing the Streamlined Sales Tax initiative is the loss of the ability to tax certain items at different tax rates and to impose caps.

Bottom line: Streamlined Sales Tax is a no lose proposition for states, not so for local governments and programs that depend on local sales taxes.

Read the entire article.

Streamlined Sales Tax Impacting Tennessee Horse Owners And Farmers

"The 9.75% state sales tax addition is not a new tax, but it is a part of the Streamlined Sales Tax Project passed in 2003. It will, however, be felt the hardest among recreational owners: those who own horses or other livestock as pets--not as sources of revenue.

Farmers selling hay could also struggle under the new guidelines."

Read the entire article.

Hawaii Considering Streamlined Sales Tax

A small easily overlooked paragraph in a much longer article mentions that Hawaii is considering adopting the Streamlined Sales Tax.

"Senators are also bringing streamlined sales tax back to the table in SB 2829, which would amend the state tax law to eventually allow the state to collect tax on Internet purchases, a particular issue for local vendors who have to compete with out-of-state vendors who can avoid the 4 percent sales tax."


Small businesses in Hawaii should make their opinions known now.

Full article here.

Vermont Towns' Revenue Drops After Streamlined Sales Tax Agreement Signed

Two Vermont towns have experienced revenue drops after the Vermont legislature signed onto the national Streamlined Sales Tax Agreement.

"In the first half of 2007, Manchester's local option tax revenue decreased by 22 percent, from $254,000 in 2006 to $196,000 in 2007. After one of its most successful quarters at the end of 2006, the town experienced one of its worst quarters at the beginning of 2007. Sales tax revenues for the town were $248,000 in the first quarter of 2006 and $157,000 in the first quarter of 2007."


To cover the shortfall, one of the towns adopted a meals-and-alcohol local option tax.

Read the entire article.

Arkansas JPs Oppose Tax Cap Removal

Amazingly, not all local governments support receiving more sales taxes.

"The Sebastian County Quorum Court was united in opposition Tuesday to the state removing a $25 cap on the county’s 1 percent sales tax. The 13 justices of the peace voted for a resolution stating their opposition to the state enacting legislation removing the tax cap."


More amazingly, these Arkansas justices of the peace plan to rebate some of the taxes back to their citizens.

"Because the funds raised by the cap removal would be returned to local governments on a per capita basis, Looper proposed setting up the same rebate system for county residents that the state government has set up for businesses."


Read the entire article.

Streamlined Sales Tax Project Governing Board Adopts Origin Sourcing Option

The new Origin Sourcing Option may offer some relief to small businesses in states that have not yet filly implemented SSUTA. It is still unknown if states that have already adopted SSUTA can roll-back their laws from destination based taxes to origin source taxes. Rolling back would provide relief to small businesses in Arkansas, California, Florida, Oklahoma, and New York.

"The Streamlined Sales Tax Project ("SSTP") Governing Board voted unanimously on December 12, 2007, to amend the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement (the "Agreement") to allow member states to elect an origin sourcing rule to source intrastate sales (i.e., sales occurring entirely within a state). The Agreement previously required its member states and their local tax jurisdictions to source transactions on a destination basis for both inter- and intrastate sales.

Pressure from both non-SSTP states (e.g., Texas, Virginia, Missouri, and Illinois) and SSTP states (e.g., Ohio, Tennessee and Utah), coupled with pressure by representatives of local tax jurisdictions, resulted in a unanimous Governing Board vote for a dramatic change to the Agreement’s long-standing destination sourcing rule. The amendment permits states to elect to retain (or adopt) origin sourcing for sourcing of intrastate sales under a uniform methodology."


Read the entire article.